Monday, February 20, 2012

Why doesn't President's Day honor Abraham Lincoln?



Abraham Lincoln may be the greatest of all US presidents. He ended slavery, won the Civil War, and ensured that the United States would remain united in the modern world. His face is printed on the five-dollar bill and stamped on the penny. The Lincoln Memorial is one of the nation’s iconic sites.


But Lincoln’s Birthday on Feb. 12 is not a national holiday, and it never has been. Nor is Lincoln officially remembered on a federal President’s Day in late February. That’s just not the case, despite a widespread belief to the contrary.


True, people have tried to make Lincoln’s birthday a US day of commemoration. One of the first was Julius Francis, a shopkeeper from Buffalo, N.Y. Beginning in 1874, he made the public remembrance of the 16th president his life’s mission, according to a 2003 Buffalo News article on the subject. He petitioned both Albany and Washington. New York went along and made Feb. 12 a state holiday. Washington and Congress did not.

Remember that for decades following the Civil War the South and North remained split as to how to remember its sacrifice and heroes. Days to remember the fallen arose on separate dates in the two regions. In was only with the nationalizing tragedy of World War I that these combined into the Memorial Day we now celebrate.
Thus, a national Lincoln holiday would have been controversial to many in the South until well into the 20th century. Perhaps that’s why Congress as a whole remained resistant.
That didn’t stop states, of course, and many state governments followed New York’s lead in establishing Lincoln’s birthday as a holiday. On Feb. 13, 2012, state offices in Illinois will be closed to honor the Great Emancipator.
But in recent years, some states have ditched Old Abe, in part because it falls near the federal holidays of Washington’s birthday and Martin Luther King Jr. Day. In 2009, the California legislature passed a bill ending Lincoln’s birthday as a paid state holiday.
This bill called for the legal public holiday known as “Washington’s Birthday” to be known by that name and no other. But it also requested that the president “issue a proclamation each year recognizing the anniversary of the birth of President Abraham Lincoln and calling upon the people of the United States to observe such anniversary with appropriate ceremonies and activities.” This legislation was assigned to the House Committee on Government Reform, and there it languished, unpassed. 

Thus, 203 years after his birth in humble circumstances in rural Kentucky, Abe Lincoln still doesn’t have a federal day to call his own. 

5 comments:

  1. Not to worry...I celebrated his birthday. Abe is one of my favorites and I'd never miss it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's great Ash! Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry, but Lincoln was not as great as he's been made out to be. Firstly, he didn't end slavery for the benefit of the slaves themselves. He set them free (in the North during the way, and the South after) as punishment to southern rebels with financial holdings in the north. As to the slaves, yes... they were turned loose, but given the difficulties that come from having no money, no jobs, no education, no property, and no options, most of them went right on working in the fields. They were loose, but still not free. As Frederick Douglass once said, "Whereas before emancipation, the white man said 'work for me or I will beat you to death,' after emancipation, that same white man said 'work for me or I will starve you to death.'"

    Lincoln held the union together, yes, but in so doing, he also created a strong nation state with pre-emotive rights that have resulted in such things as federal raids on marijuana dispensaries in states where medicinal marijuana was legalized.

    Lincoln is sold to us as a hero... as a great man, and there is no doubt that he had the fortitude to make some tough decisions during a crucial time in our nation's history, but to cite him as blameless or virtuous in regard to either emancipation or re-unification of the union is myopic.

    Don't take my word for it. Do some more research.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Sevastian,

    Thanks for stopping by and sharing your opinion about Lincoln. I have no doubt that he was not everything we have been led to believe, no one is, really. But as you state, he did have the fortitude to make some very tough decisions.

    ReplyDelete