Or is it?
Write what you
know. That’s what they say
(whoever “they” are). And they’re
right. Sort of.
But what if you
desperately want to write about a diabetic serial killer who has taken a group
of high school students hostage and is killing them one at a time unless the
police give in to his demands and provide a steady stream of insulin and candy
bars?
And now you’re faced
with the question: do you know anything about diabetes? Insulin? Serial killers?
High school students (sometimes just telling high school students apart from serial killers is hard enough)? Candy bars?
Chances are, if you’re
anything like me, you have some information about diabetes, less about
insulin. Serial killers? I’m gonna plead the Fifth on that
one. And yeah, I know I was a high school student, but much of
that has been blocked out and the shrinks say something like “mental walls” and
“extreme stress-related traumatic amnesia” and “you still owe me five hundred
dollars,” so I’m more limited on what high school students are than anything
else.
I do know candy bars.
So, by my count, I have
a commanding understanding of… (mental calculations)… about 30% of what I want
to write about. Which means I have
three options: scrap the project, write it and try to b.s. my way through the
stuff I don’t know, or research the stuff I don’t know about and then write it.
Want to know what the
worst thing to do is? Scrap the
project.
Second worst? Research the stuff you don’t know.
Now, don’t get me
wrong. I think that research can
really improve your work… if you do it right. And that’s a big muthah of an “if.” The problem with research is that
people either do it shoddily (in which case you’ve just wasted time and gotten
no return on that investment), or worse, they forget the research is just a
means to an end. The research
becomes the point, and the writer
forgets to actually, you know, WRITE!
This almost happened to
me on my last project, a fairly good haunted house story called The Haunted. Now, as of this writing The
Haunted is currently in its second straight month on amazon.com’s Horror
Bestsellers, so I must have done something
right (or write… get it? I crack
me up!). But I very nearly didn’t get it right. Or even written at all. See, the story is about ghosts, it’s
about things that go bump in the night.
It’s about exorcisms and ghost-hunting techniques, and about a family
that has some very serious problems that I have never personally run into. So I decided (bright guy that I am) to
do some research.
And what did I find?
ABSO-FRICKIN-LUTELY FASCINATING STUFF!
But see, that was the
problem. After a few days I
realized that I had wandered far astray from my original goal, which was to
research enough about specific things to write the story I had in mind in a
credible way. Now, I was just
researching in a neverending stream of Google, read, Google, read, Google,
read. Then lather, rinse, and
repeat. It could have gone on
forever (if there’s one thing I absolutely know, it’s that the internet is
basically infinite).
For some writers, I
think this actually happens to them.
They start researching for information that will support their plot;
that will enrich their characters.
But they become so enamored of the information that they follow it too
far. They spend too much time on
it, and suddenly they find out they’re feeling over-interested about one thing
or another totally unrelated to the bones of their story. Suddenly, the work has transformed from
fiction to a passion project.
This is the kiss of
death. Being passionate about your
work is great, but when a writer forgets that he or she is a storyteller first
and foremost, and starts thinking of him or herself as a political activist who
will slip critical info into a ripping good story… well, you’ve got trouble.
I want to be clear here:
having a message in your work is great.
When a fiction writer takes a kick-butt plot and fills it with
believable and interesting characters, that’s a win. Then if the author can bolster the whole thing with
thematics or a moral message, you just might have a classic on your hands.
But that’s the only way it works. Sadly, too many writers – and this is
especially endemic to the highly successful writers, who feel that they’ve got “something
important to say” and enough clout that they don’t have to listen to their
editor or publisher anymore – suddenly decide that the first thing should be the message. And then they fill in the cracks around that message with a
plot that they crease and bend until it fits around that message, whether it
was meant to or not. Then maybe
they throw in a few characters who aren’t really characters, but a series of
strawmen and mouthpieces.
Surprisingly to no one
but the author, this makes for a second-rate novel, which, at its core, is not
a story, but a lecture.
So now, let’s return to
the premise we started with. Write
what you know. And if you don’t
know something, fine. Research
it. But don’t become a researcher.
That’s a different (and usually higher-paying) job than that of a
storyteller. Find out what you
need. Then stop and write the damn
story.
Writing a story is what
makes a writer. Not spending time
in the library, not getting out there and finding stuff out. Granted, you have to have a life, and
the richer your life, the deeper and richer your writing will tend to be. But write write write at the end of the
day. Write write write as soon as
you know enough to tell your story.
Research can be great. It can be fun. It can improve your story… as long as
you remember that’s the reason you’re doing the research in the first place.
Research is a means.
Story
is the end.
And anyone who tells you
different… well, they’re just trying to keep the quality of the competition
low.
***
Michaelbrent Collings is
an internationally bestselling author and produced screenwriter. His first novel, RUN, was a #1 bestseller on amazon’s horror and sci-fi lists, and
his most recent project, The Haunted,
has been on amazon’s Bestselling Horror for longer than most Hollywood
marriages. He is also a produced
screenwriter, member of the Writers Guild of America and Horror Writers of
America, and hopes to have a cool robot arm someday.
You can follow him on Facebook at www.facebook.com/MichaelbrentCollings, or just cyberstalk him at his own website: michaelbrentcollings.com. He also offers screenwriting and novel writing assistance at reasonable fees, so drop him a line if you need help. Or even if you don’t. ‘Cause it can be lonely out there.
You can follow him on Facebook at www.facebook.com/MichaelbrentCollings, or just cyberstalk him at his own website: michaelbrentcollings.com. He also offers screenwriting and novel writing assistance at reasonable fees, so drop him a line if you need help. Or even if you don’t. ‘Cause it can be lonely out there.
What a great post. I tend to over-research because, well, I like to research. I usually pick a day and do nothing but research. I read 'Run' on a prompt from a friend. It was fabulous! I can't wait to read your next.
ReplyDeleteRaven